This post will have a live video stream of the confirmation hearing when it begins, around 10 a.m. ET.
Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt has been among the most controversial picks for Donald Trump’s cabinet. In part, that’s because the Environmental Protection Agency nominee has a track record of saying things like:
“I think the attitude with the EPA and certain environmental groups is that fossil fuels are bad — period. And they’re doing everything they can to use the rulemaking process to attack.”
As Oklahoma’s lead attorney, Pruitt has been a leader in going after the environmental agency, joining other Republican attorneys general in lawsuits to stop ozone and methane emissions regulations and Obama’s signature climate plan.
Pruitt’s public defense of coal, oil and natural gas — all industries the EPA oversees — as well as his questioning of climate science means he may face stiff opposition in Wednesday’s confirmation hearing.
“This is not somebody who should be leading the Environmental Protection Agency,” says Michael Brune, executive director of the Sierra Club. “Pruitt has basically made his career working to tear down, or at least challenge, environmental and public health safeguards. So why does he want to lead EPA?”
Brune hopes the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee asks tough questions about that Wednesday — and about the hundreds of thousands of dollars in campaign contributions that Pruitt has received from the fossil fuel industry.
Pruitt, who declined requests for an interview, has been less active than his predecessor in the Oklahoma attorney general’s office in pursuing environmental cases. Court records and data collected by the Environmental Working Group also suggest Pruitt stalled a state lawsuit regarding water pollution from chicken manure after receiving contributions linked to the poultry industry.
Kay Mills of Missori worries that big corporations will have Pruitt’s ear on policy. She and other members of the Moms Clean Air Force traveled to Washington, D.C., to pressure their senators to reject Pruitt’s nomination.
“I’m really concerned about Scott Pruitt’s rejection of science,” Mills says. “In particular, his rejection of the science around mercury pollution. As a pregnant mother … I’ve been thinking a lot about mercury and how that impacts my unborn baby.”
Pruitt’s industry ties are seen as a good thing by many of his supporters, and he’s likely to get a positive reception from Republican senators from fossil-fuel producing states. Groups representing drillers and miners say their economic concerns were largely ignored over the past eight years.
“We can achieve the goals of the environmental improvement without sacrificing our economic development, energy security, jobs,” Marty Durbin of the American Petroleum Institute told reporters in endorsing Pruitt.