Hard To Identify Many Mass Murders As Mentally Ill Beforehand

Update Required To play the media you will need to either update your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin.

In the modern era, legislative attempts to keep guns out of the hands of the mentally ill are nearly half a century old. In many ways, we've made little or no progress. There are numerous reasons for this failure and those reasons explain why the odds of success of any new legislative initiative to the problem of mentally ill having access to guns is very, very low. These challenges explain why none of the three of the most prominent recent mass shooters — Jared Loughner, Seung-Hui Cho and Adam Lanza — would have been affected by any current legislation involving the mentally ill and guns. Loughner had not met the conditions necessary for reporting his name to the federal database and he obtained weapons legally from a dealer. Cho was not deemed at imminent risk of causing harm, and was not involuntarily committed, and he was therefore not reported. Lanza does not seem to have been involuntarily committed, either, and, in any event, he didn't buy guns from a dealer — he simply took guns belonging to a family member.

Health

Hard To Identify Many Mass Murders As Mentally Ill Beforehand

Contributed By:

Comments

Thanks to our Sponsors:

Also in News

A Token Gift May Encourage Gift Of Life

Heart Failure Treatment Improves, But Death Rate Remains High

Having a Dog May Mean Having Extra Microbes

Thanks to our Sponsors