Land | Environment

Western States' Public Lands Fight Comes To Idaho

EarthFix | Jan. 22, 2013 3:15 p.m.

Contributed By:

BOISE, Idaho — A fight between Western states and the federal government over control of public lands has surfaced in the Northwest. Last year Utah and Arizona lawmakers passed bills requiring the feds to sign public land over to them. Now Idaho lawmakers are discussing whether a similar bill is right for their state.

A growing frustration over how the federal government manages public lands was at the core of Utah Representative Ken Ivory presentation to Idaho lawmakers. Utah passed a bill last year ordering the federal government to relinquish about 30 million acres of federal land to the state. The feds would retain national parks, monuments, and wilderness. The Utah law requires the land turned over by 2014.

“Well, in Utah the approach that we’ve took is that federal public lands become state public lands,” Ivory told Idaho lawmakers at a hearing this week. “To be managed to multiple use and sustained yield with local planning. So those public uses, we preserve that because thats who we are.”

Ivory says the federal government hasn’t done a good job in managing millions of acres of federal public land. He says Western states do a better job reducing the risk of wildfires by allowing more logging and grazing.

If states take over these public lands, it would be them — not federal agencies — that charge ranchers for grazing rights and companies that want to cut down trees, Ivory adds. The money raised could then be used for education and other programs that states help pay for.

Ivory formed an advocacy group called the American Lands Council to promote his cause.

Not everyone agrees with Rep. Ivory. Jonathan Oppenheimer with the Idaho Conservation League says he’s worried that environmental protections and recreational opportunities would be sacrificed if states take over public lands now managed by the federal government.

“If these lands were turned over … we would see these lands sold to the highest bidder and we would see access restricted and we would see the impacts of that with reduced environmental quality,” Oppenheimer says. “And those are things we have concerns over and certainly want to see Idaho’s public lands remain in public hands.”

Idaho House Speaker Scott Bedke, R-Oakley, says the idea has been well received by his colleagues. He is interested in hearing more. But Bedke stopped short of saying if he would support the bill.

Ivory, the Utah lawmaker behind the push for state control of public lands, says he’s reached out to lawmakers in Oregon and Washington. But he has not been invited to present his ideas in those states.

Comments

blog comments powered by Disqus
Thanks to our Sponsors:
become a sponsor
Thanks to our Sponsors
become a sponsor