2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

You are correct, and there are thousands of children *already here* who need the kind of home you and your wife can offer. 

posted 4 years, 3 months ago
view in context

And for less than $60,000 and no bedrest (no lost pregnancies, no associated heartache, not to mention the stress on your body) you could have offered a loving, stable, deserving home to two children whose only needs were to be chosen and loved. 

I would be interested in a conversation among people, like you, who have gone to such great lengths to have their own children -even in the face of great financial, physical and emotional stress -rather than consider adoption. 

posted 4 years, 3 months ago
view in context

Good points which bring up other ethical questions...  I knew a man who supplemented his financial aid in college with the help of the payment he received from sperm donation.  At the time, he was young and healthy and, evidently, unaware of the mental illness that plagued both sides of his family.  Years later, he suffered from crippling (and violent) depression and has never notified the sperm bank. 

posted 4 years, 3 months ago
view in context

Amen.

posted 4 years, 3 months ago
view in context

Good point, and likely we would not.  Though that would bring up another host of ethical questions: surrogacy is one thing, but a baby factory?

posted 4 years, 3 months ago
view in context

Why are we not talking about adoption???

posted 4 years, 3 months ago
view in context

While my initial reaction to the octuplets (plus 6) was one of horror and disgust steeped in judgement, further reflection leaves me sad.  Sad for the tens (hundreds?) of thousands of children who are not adopted every year, sad for the women whose desperate need for a child outweighs all else, and (as a teacher of at-risk youth) sad for a society that does a mediocre job of caring for the children already on this planet. 

posted 4 years, 3 months ago
view in context