2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

Actually Pete, it's not true that the people in charge of OregonLive have *always* been part of the advertising arm of Newhouse. I must not have made that clear when we talked at length about OregonLive a few months ago.

While I can't speak to the current staff at all, I was OL's founding editor & had nothing to do with advertising.  We had clear lines between advertising & editorial at the time.

I won't quibble about the need for 'substantive changes' to the site itself, though...!

posted 3 years, 7 months ago
view in context