2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

As a voter, shouldn?t I have more choices, not fewer? Limiting our general election ballot to choosing between the lesser of two evils, as a result of who has the biggest campaign war chest is no way for Oregon to run our elections. Just because Washington State has headed down this road, doesn?t mean we should! If there is a concern about how the primary?s work, let?s fix them, not throw them out all together! Does it make sense to change who can have access to the ballot?

posted 4 years, 8 months ago
view in context