2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

I was a panel participant in the Citizen's Initiative Review in Salem this fall. It was gratifying and enlightening to base my vote on substantiative information regarding Measure 58. Since initiatives seem to take a backseat to candidates in the news and there is little, if any, public factual debate during prime time regarding these measures, most people decide how to vote based on dramatic advertising sound bites on the radio and TV, glossy sensational mailers, and often-misleading statements paid for by pro and con advocates in the voters' pamphlet. The findings of an independent citizens' review panel included in the voter's pamphlet would provide impartial and in-depth analysis of the initiative measures that voters might not otherwise receive. I think there is a great need to provide our public with trustworthy, unbiased information regarding ballot measures.

Another bonus to the review process is that people who participate on these panels have opportunity for civic involvement that may never have been possible for them. I know I came away from serving on the panel with new insights and awareness that I have shared with many people during this election. I optimistically hope to have started a "ripple effect" in advocating for thoughtful and informed analysis of issues within my own circle of influence to promote higher standards and expectations of ballot initiatives and politics in general. Oregonians need facts, not slanted advertising sound bites. We deserve accurate information to form our decisions regarding issues which will greatly impact the quality of life in our state. The inclusion of a citizens' review would provide a healthy component to our initiative process.

posted 4 years, 6 months ago
view in context