2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session 2013 special election arts arts and culture author ballot measures bomb books budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration international internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal portland mayor president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes television terrorism theater third parties timber payments transportation union university of oregon violence washington water wildfire women

I own firearms, and am contemplating getting a concealed-carry permit.  Concealed carry has a purpose, and that is for personal protection and security without visibility--it won't upset others.  Open carry is a reasonable option, though perhaps not in heavily populated areas.  As for knowing who's carrying... there are far and wide implications, for instance, is the one carrying a firearm a person who is being stalked over a long period of time?  Does this person have very dangerous working conditions?  It seems there may be a long, long list of reasons why concealed carry should remain as private information.  I guarantee that those who want to outlaw guns will always argue against concealed carry or open carry.  They will not have a very reasonable position in this discussion.

posted 3 years, 2 months ago
view in context