2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session 2013 special election arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration international internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

I am the 1972 valedictorian of PHS. I was born and raised in Philomath and the Clemens personally knew my parents and relatives. The scholarsahip paid for my college education and I am very grateful for it. The Clemens scholarship started as a loan progrm that when almost no one repaid it, they changed to a scholarship. A scholarship is a gift, not an entitlement. It is only natural that any scholarship can and will change requirements over time.

I think the conflict resulted because people changed from viewing it as a scholarhip to an entitlement. No scholarship is an entitlement! We should be grateful for everything the Clemens gave to Philomath - the pool, the allweather track, the football field, etc. While they were unable to have children themselves, the children of Philomath were very dear to them and they did what they could to benefit them.

posted 5 years ago
view in context