2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

As a recently retired director of an Oregon arts organization, someone with two decades of philanthropy experience and a donor to the Oregon Cultural Trust, I was very upset to learn that money for which I and others donated and received a tax deduction was taken away from the Trust for non-arts purposes. One of the first principles of philanthropic giving is that donor intent matters, which is where the ethical issues arise. I and others gave money specifically to the arts, and that agreement was breeched. I will continue to support the Trust, but I have lost a great deal of trust in those who have invaded the funds that were given in good faith for the arts.

Don Drake

Salem

posted 4 years, 2 months ago
view in context