Oregon Public Broadcasting

1st congressional district 2012 election 2012 session agriculture art arts author beer births books budget business central oregon college congress crime culture death penalty eastern oregon economy education employment energy environment eugene fishing food gangs gay rights health health care high school history homeless housing jobs law legislature literature living media mental health military movies music native americans obama occupy portland occupy wall street onthejob oregon our town outdoors parenting police politics portland portland business journal portland mayor pregnancy prison public health race rebroadcast recess recession religion republicans rural schools science shooting sports supreme court talking business technology teen theater unemployment union university of oregon washington water weekend women youth

I keep seeing and hearing comments to this effect, that this sort of scandal sets gay rights back, and I find this to be an extremely problematic viewpoint. A central issue of fighting for equal rights for sexual minorities is that what we do in our own bedrooms is our own business, and shouldn't make us secondary citizens, or less deserving of respect, fairness and human dignity. The idea that Sam should uphold the most vanilla image of a gay man possible in order to pander to biggots does nothing to advance tolerance in our society.

I don't care what sort of private consensual sex activities Sam Adams takes part in, and, while I think it was wrong and unwise for him to lie to the public, it's understandable that he would do so, as the issue is irrelevant to his qualifications as mayor. Ideally, he should have said that it was none of our business, but a lie about something this irrelevant should not require his resignation.

posted 3 years, 4 months ago
view in context