Suggest a Topic
RECENTLY ON TOL:
The TOL Blog
TAGS:
1st congressional district
2012 election
2012 session
agriculture
art
arts
author
beer
births
books
budget
business
central oregon
college
congress
crime
culture
death penalty
eastern oregon
economy
education
employment
energy
environment
eugene
fishing
food
gangs
gay rights
health
health care
high school
history
homeless
housing
jobs
law
legislature
literature
living
media
mental health
military
movies
music
native americans
obama
occupy portland
occupy wall street
onthejob
oregon
our town
outdoors
parenting
police
politics
portland
portland business journal
portland mayor
pregnancy
prison
public health
race
rebroadcast
recess
recession
religion
republicans
rural
schools
science
shooting
sports
supreme court
talking business
technology
teen
theater
unemployment
union
university of oregon
washington
water
weekend
women
youth
see all tags >>
Kathleen's comments:
on Time to Bail?
There is a provision in the sarbanes oxley law called the mark to market rule. This was passed after the Enron and WorldCom fiascos to address ethics reform. Economist Wesbury suggests changing that one provision temporarily for our current economy crisis, because it is that that is keeping our economy frozen.
He also advocates extending insurance by the federal government but no loans. If we do this, the taxpayers aren't stuck with a $700 billion debt. However, with the government backing the loans with insurance, then banks are free to loan money again and the economy can repair itself. Just because the subprime market bottomed out, it doesn't mean that the houses behind those mortgages are worth nothing. There is genuine real estate backing them up.
I believe we all should write or call our representatives and senators to back this action. Instead of spending $700 billion, Wesbury says the cost would be dramatically reduced to around $40 billion--a much more reasonable solution and accomplishes the same thing without sticking taxpayers with the debt or making them mortgage bankers.
He also advocates extending insurance by the federal government but no loans. If we do this, the taxpayers aren't stuck with a $700 billion debt. However, with the government backing the loans with insurance, then banks are free to loan money again and the economy can repair itself. Just because the subprime market bottomed out, it doesn't mean that the houses behind those mortgages are worth nothing. There is genuine real estate backing them up.
I believe we all should write or call our representatives and senators to back this action. Instead of spending $700 billion, Wesbury says the cost would be dramatically reduced to around $40 billion--a much more reasonable solution and accomplishes the same thing without sticking taxpayers with the debt or making them mortgage bankers.
posted 3 years, 8 months ago
view in context


