2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

I haven't heard any discussion about the rights of non gun owners. I have never owned a gun, nor do I want anyone carrying a gun to come into my home or (ideally) my workplace. It seems to me that if you are carrying a deadly weapon I have a right to know, so that I can ensure my own safety as I see fit. In my case this means not being near a gun!

posted 4 years, 5 months ago
view in context