2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

The state is looking for public input - this is input from ANYONE - not just residents of the state, stakeholders, commercial fishermen or recreational fishermen. Input is coming from all over the country on this issue, much of which is from people who do not realize how our ocean resources are currently managed. We have seen a barrage of feel good terms developed and thrown about for the sake of the general public: our oceans are over fished, created breeding grounds, x% of species are over harvested, MRs create research opportunities, preserve our aquaculture. On the surface, who wouldn't take this bait? But without knowing all of the intricacies of the current management systems in place, why would someone object to this?

There are many questions that need to be asked - one of which is WHY? What is Oregon NOT doing right now that warrants the need for MRs at this point? What research has been done and what information has been gathered to support the implementation of MRs? The strongest arguments from proponents is "it's a good idea" and "Oregon is the only coastal state without them." So what?

Further, one of the guests was a little misleading when answering the question about diving. Based on what I've learned about the definition of MRs is that NO, and I repeat NO activities will be allowed within MRs except for research activities.

posted 5 years, 2 months ago
view in context