Oregon Public Broadcasting

1st congressional district 2012 election 2012 session agriculture art arts author beer births books budget business central oregon college congress crime culture death penalty eastern oregon economy education employment energy environment eugene fishing food gangs gay rights health health care high school history homeless housing jobs law legislature literature living media mental health military movies music native americans obama occupy portland occupy wall street onthejob oregon our town outdoors parenting police politics portland portland business journal portland mayor pregnancy prison public health race rebroadcast recess recession religion republicans rural schools science shooting sports supreme court talking business technology teen theater unemployment union university of oregon washington water weekend women youth

Randy Leonard's comments about the 12 lane bridge are ridiculous.  Putting a sidewalk on the bridge is nice, and light rail is nice, but if that were sufficient for encouraging non-auto use, then the 12 lane bridge would be unnecessary, because there would be no increase in traffic.  It doesn't work both ways.  If there are increases in traffic & congestion (which would just be pushed to the rose quarter), then emissions rise (which runs counter to the state's stated policies and goals).

posted 3 years, 2 months ago
view in context

As for Sam's affair, I don't care about that per se.  Its not my business, nor do I think it should be part of the public discourse.  Yes, he lied about the affair, and I understand that is problematic. I don't think that lie overshadows or should overshadow the good things he has done in the past.

However, if the damage to his political capital hampers his ability to lead and make wise and necessary decisions for portland's sustainability, then its a problem for all of us. 

I think Sam's claim to be an environmentalist seriously needs to be questioned when he turns around in support of the CRC, which will only cause more congestion, cause a rise in emissions and other related negative consequences (sprawl, health concerns).

Can Sam please explain why he is moving forward with his support of the CRC despite numerous serious questions about it (as identified by Coalition for a Liveable Future, health officials, university researchers and other groups)? 

Thanks,

Michael

posted 3 years, 2 months ago
view in context