2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session 2013 special election arts arts and culture author ballot measures bomb books budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration international internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal portland mayor president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes television terrorism theater third parties timber payments transportation union university of oregon violence washington water wildfire women

As a former Nevada resident, I need to correct your guest about Nevada's Voter Consent Law. The "None of the above" option is purely advisory. The candidate with the most votes is elected no matter how many votes are received for "None of the above". The law, NRS 293.269 was enacted in 1976. In a highly contentious and acrimonious 3-way Supreme Court race, "None of the above" received over 163,000 votes - 21% of the total cast.

posted 4 years, 7 months ago
view in context