2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

When entering a legal agreeement would you allow the other party to not hold up there end of the deal or would you just let it go and say oh thats ok I do not need the money for all that land and royalties that was promised and even signed a legal document to that effect. Now years later, 200 and more, everybody says they don't deserve that, why them, that was a long time ago. We have just integrated and learned to play the game and try to keep up with the rules as they are made up. Think of it this way if you had something owed or coming to you like say you income tax return, and it is a nice one then it never shows up, you never receive anything, nothing is ever heard about it. When you ask questions you are ignored, bullied, and swindled. Then if they ever do pay it is way less and has all kinds of stipulations on how you can use it. All we are asking for is what is owed and what was promised to us. 

posted 3 years, 2 months ago
view in context