2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

What I haven't heard addressed:

How can the UO buy out 140+ years of equity that taxpayers have paid into the institution?

Also, Phil Knight was quoted in the Oregonian as saying the change would first allow UO to charge Oregonians more for tuition -- they're not paying enough, he said -- and would allow it to operate as a private university. So, how is this good for Oregonians?

posted 2 years, 2 months ago
view in context