2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

What's not slipping through is the money. It does not trickle down; that would be a leak, and, the rich know how to keep from leaking money. They take a profit from our work, a profit when we spend ( every penny ), and when we run out of money ( since we don't get paid enough to continue driving the economy with our spending )they take a profit in the form of interest from the money we have to borrow to spend to live. Sorry for the rant, but, given the new nature of the recent successful presidential campaign; do we still need the rich to run things? The bailout is, I'm sorry, RIDICULOUS!Are they ever going to share the fruits? NEVER!

Suggested Topic: Have the rich outlived their usefulness?

posted 4 years, 6 months ago
view in context