2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

Thank you. I absolutely agree with you about your inability to understand Kulongoski's support. And now the Oregonian's editorial page has weighed in on the same side! For me, there are huge social and environmental reasons to oppose the casino. I simply don't believe that the benefits touted by the supporters will come to pass. The Columbia River Gorge National Scenic Area is too precious and too fragile to gamble it away on this huge project. Once gone, it will be gone.

posted 5 years, 2 months ago
view in context