2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

I have two comments.
1. I want to Thank Kevin Mannix for pointing out Erickson's character flaws. I feel it actually speaks more to Mannix's character--or lack of.
Mannix's desperate attempt to discredit his opponent rather than focus on issues such as the economy (I am unemployed) and the environment.
I don't care what Erickson does in his private life. I want to know what Erickson is likely to do that will effect all of us.
2. Any man who is so arrogant that he feels he should have the say over what a woman does with her body will never get my vote.

posted 5 years ago
view in context