2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session 2013 special election arts arts and culture author ballot measures bomb books budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration international internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal portland mayor president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes television terrorism theater third parties timber payments transportation union university of oregon violence washington water wildfire women

It's not the right of the city to give the right to be nude in public. It has nothing to do with childhood sexual abuse. It has everything to do with protecting the parent's right to decide!!!!!

posted 3 years, 5 months ago
view in context

Decency is not an uptight religious stand. If people want to be nude in public, there are public places designated for that. To reverse that and only provide public places where nudity is not allowed is an affront to MOST parents of children. Children's ideas of sexuality should be in the hands of THEIR parents. A parent should not have to avoid areas outdoors because the only places nudity isn't allowed is schools and playgrounds... this is asinine.

posted 3 years, 5 months ago
view in context