2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session 2013 special election arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

Hi,

I appreciate the cost concerns that your speaker is expounding upon; certainly nothing is free, especially energy. But lest eveyone forgets, even though hydropower seems "green" in the short term, it is by no means green over time. The necessity to bring our waterways back to their natural state is worth it. Sure the timeline and timing is worth debate.
Perhaps the questions should be posed to PacifiCorp folks is do they REALLY believe that dam removal is ultimately a good thing for the whole of society (including nature).

Thanks.

posted 4 years, 6 months ago
view in context