2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session 2013 special election arts arts and culture author ballot measures bomb books budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration international internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal portland mayor president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes television terrorism theater third parties timber payments transportation union university of oregon violence washington water wildfire women

Where would you propse they shoot them? Major arteries run through the entire human body and being shot in the leg for example, could sever an artery that bleeds a person out in less than a minute. Also, if an officer has made the discision to shoot a suspect then they typically pose an armed threat.  If you wound someone with a gun then they can cntinue to shoot at you or the public.

posted 3 years, 6 months ago
view in context

I am pondering whether people would take police derective more seriously if the threat of force was more common.  I beleive in a free and just society in which my civil liberties are not trampled on but I also have began to feel that there may be to much understanding and leniency from our government and society. Perhaps if there were harsher physical reprecutions for illegal acts then there would be less crime? Just a thought.

posted 3 years, 6 months ago
view in context

Where did you get your statistics from?

posted 3 years, 6 months ago
view in context