2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session 2013 special election arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration international internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

This was a human being with a name. How dare the Chief of Police lable this person, this human being, "a subject" ! Jack was not a "subject,"  like some word in a sentence. He was a man, with a story, a whole sad life story. Whatever all his various failings may have been in this  life, at least give him the dignity of calling him by name: Jack. To depersonalize him is to continue a misbegotten righteousness that is callous, inhumane and self-serving.  And when we loose our humanity....we loose our soul. There are clearly deep resentments and a frigthening sense of entitlement within the police bureau...all around, there is much healing to be done. Can our city do it?

posted 3 years, 2 months ago
view in context