2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

Based on my knowledge in regards to this matter, why the jury couldn't convict the officer, and then talk about the mishandling of the procedure in away the police should behave. this shows the jury didn't fairly dealt with the case. if the jury knows that the police didn't had training to act to the situation, then why let the officer free, this is contradicting to final decission they made.

posted 3 years, 3 months ago
view in context