2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

I am a Spanish-English bilingual attorney that sees every day the vast need for bilingual professionals (lawyers, doctors) and support staff. For this reason, I am a huge proponent of bilingual education. This bill is motivated by discrimination, particularly because it has an exception that states that the time limitation does not apply to English-language speakers. Why? Because experience shows us that a language cannot be fully acquired in a limited period of time and basic education theory shows that not all students learn all subjects on the same timeline.

posted 4 years, 7 months ago
view in context