2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

What is the age of the data used for this study?  Have methodologies gotten better currently to alleviate the unnecessary treatment for false positives?

posted 3 years, 6 months ago
view in context

The "pro subsidy" folks frequently say that the subsidies are needed because the costs, fertilizer and fuel are high. I thought the subsidies are based on net income. Costs should make no difference in that case.

posted 5 years ago
view in context