2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session 2013 special election arts arts and culture author ballot measures bomb books budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration international internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal portland mayor president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes television terrorism theater third parties timber payments transportation union university of oregon violence washington water wildfire women

If I understand the way our state works, such changes to a professional law (especially health care) is not taken lightly.  This change was looked at closely, even before the session started.  

The answers to the question of ND responsibility is answered as with any other health profession with regulatory oversight in Oregon, the doctor can only provide the service s/he is educated and trained to do within the scope of that practice.  

This law was not changed with big money, but with many discussions involving legislators and professionals. The health care of Oregonians was paramount. I think we will see good things come from this.

posted 4 years ago
view in context