2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

As a professional truck driver I can say there are two other larger bottle necks on I-5. One to the north is called Seattle the other is to the south, Las Angeles. Both add much more time to north south travel than crossing the Columbia. Should we bridge both of these impediments?

The main reason for the congestion is 3 lanes going south into 2 lanes. Making the bridge wider will not ease congestion at all if the roadway into Portland is not widend as well

posted 4 years, 11 months ago
view in context