2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session 2013 special election arts arts and culture author ballot measures bomb books budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration international internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal portland mayor president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes television terrorism theater third parties timber payments transportation union university of oregon violence washington water wildfire women

blaeloch: removal of wilderness protection for an area in Alaska is a very serious matter. I'm sure this information was not widely known. It was probably an amendment that got slipped in when no one was looking. I would like to suggest to you that if you want "big enviro groups' opposition" to bad ideas like this, you need to notify the environmental community and ask for help. Perhaps you read information about Alaska that the rest of us don't read. As a general policy, try to find ways to work with us

posted 4 years, 5 months ago
view in context

The writer from Government Camp doesn't seem to understand that the land swap is necessary to get MHM off the north side of the mountain (totally). Government Camp is already urbanized; the north side of the mountain is nearly pristine. The problem with Meadows is that they have a ski permit at Cooper Spur (north side) issued from the FS that allows them to expand and tear apart the old growth and other vegetation -- more bulldozing -- disrupting the migration corridors for wildlife. Among proposed expansion projects, the FS would allow a chair lift landing with all the gadgetry and apparatus into Cloud Cap the area across the gravel road from designated wilderness. Since Government Camp is already urbanized, building condos there would seem more appropriate.

posted 4 years, 5 months ago
view in context

It has been very difficult to get this wilderness bill passed. It seems as though its been a six-year effort. The Oregon delegation supported it, but we ran afoul of Senator Tom Coburn. Perhaps the negatives expressed on this page have at least some validity, but if we pursue perfection, we will get nothing. All of us involved in the effort testified many times at the Hood River County Commissioners over the years. We had to overcome resistance from local elected officials and business persons who thought building in the Crystal Springs watershed with an alpine shopping mall, plus 450 condos and septic tanks in a wild pristine area was a wonderful business opportunity. The north side of Mt. Hood is the least urbanized side of the mountain. There are still cougar, black bear, elk and deer herds there. The wildlife need a chance to survive. Summer hikers and wintertime backcountry skiers have marveled at the great pristine beauty of the north side. With the US population growing exponentially year after year, we have to take action to save what acreage we can in its natural state for our children and grandchildren. Opportunities like this are becoming fewer and fewer.

posted 4 years, 5 months ago
view in context