2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

i would like to ask the new superindent how he feels about the iatrogenic illness that he supervises--his pts. are labeled with diseases such as schizopherenia and bipolar and the given 'medicine' which commonly cause brain damage.

i saw a griffito 40 years ago that said 'a liberal is someone who listens to both sides of the argument and then cuts the baby in half.'

is a reformer psych hospital administrator someone who listens to both sides of the medication issue and the cuts the dosage in half -- but possibly fails to lower the brain damage rate???

posted 2 years, 1 month ago
view in context

the analogy between psychotropics and antibiotics is moronic. it reminds me of 1971 when i was told that i had a lithium deficiency and would need to take a toxic salt that causes renal failure. the miracle drug thorazine that i was assauited and battered with (a legal construct for forcible medication) nearly killed me.  

i appreciate and support the refere]nces to whitakers book but it is not new or esoteric information that major tranqulilizers -- USED AS DIRECTED -- cause permanent BRAIN DAMAGE in a minimum of 15% of those who take them. that number is from NAMI but the consumer/survivor/EXINMATES ie me can show evidence that the proper number is closer to 50%.

i think the proper analogy is between psych 'meds' and cigarettes. both were pimped by doctors -- in the case of cigs i guess most of the docs were actors dressed as doctors -- and if used as directed horrible things happen

posted 2 years, 1 month ago
view in context