2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

Unfortunately, the teacher's union is unwilling to discuss anything other than tenure and educational status for teacher pay. If not student test scores, performance reviews, parental satisfaction, etc., then what is an objective evaluation? It seems the union is worried that some teacher's won't measure up to some objective test, so they describe everything as subjective other than tenure and educational status. That's why many in the public are frustrated with the union's entrenched position. That's why many conversations are being had about some alternatives. We all get evaluated in our jobs, and it's based around performance and outcomes, achievements and contributions. Sure length of time on a job may have some influence in the equation, and educational level certainly has a place as well. But to restrict pay to those two standards only (tenure/education level) is silly and makes the union look more and more out of touch with public. Teaching is a challenging profession and takes certain types of personality, training, and passion to do a really good job. But every job has it's challenges and standards. And teachers do get lots of perks and benefits and the average pay is higher than the state-wide average of other jobs in Oregon. For the training required and type of work is the pay comparable to similar professional jobs? Depends on what you compare it to. So let's be objective and get the discussion beyond tenure and training -- it is for most everyone else.

posted 5 years ago
view in context