2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session 2013 special election arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration international internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

I believe the Initiative Process is a highly desirable, although not essential, provision to check abuse of power in government, and to allow the voice of Oregonians to be heard.

However, the landscape has changed since the original concept, and now the voice being heard is not that of Oregonians, but that of out-of-state, high rolling special interests.

Add to that, the abuse of the system and damage to our state by local individuals with a proven axe to grind, and crafted with such little care and concern for the after effects, has thrown the concept into total disrepute.

I would suggest the following:

Any proposed change to the Constitution must first be cleared by the Legislature and the Courts.

Any initiative measure passed by the public, would be required to be reviewed by the Legislature, with a 2/3 majority required to overrule the proposed changes.

Any proposed measure should be required to file a statement of financial impact. If that cost impact is exceeded by a set percentage within the first two years, it should be rescinded.

Any measure that affects areas of law or procedure other than as outlined specifically in the measure, should be immediately put on hold and professionally reviewed.

Thanks for the show!

David Bales

posted 4 years, 6 months ago
view in context