2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

John Kroger appears woefully unqualified to comment on the possibilities of  potential "accidental" viewing. As a 15 year software engineer I can say it would not be difficult to create a trojan which downloads *thousands* of images to your computer, as well as faking forensic trails of searches, all without the user having any idea this was going on. It is far from a "myth", as Mr. Kroger put it, that malicious websites can frame a person in this way. I'm glad you now have him on record assuring the public that there will never be a wrongful conviction as a result of such framing, because we can play that back to him when it ultimately and inevitably happens.

I'm not saying viewing child porn is okay, but if merely having some images and search traces on your computer is going to be enough to a conviction, an innocent person is eventually going to be put in jail.

posted 2 years, 4 months ago
view in context