2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session 2013 special election arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration international internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

By wanting this information to be public clearly shows that one does not trust the police.
But these are the same people who say we don?t need guns the police will protect us.
There is something wrong with this logic.

posted 4 years, 5 months ago
view in context

Scott
Why, should this info be public, please give me a valid reason?

posted 4 years, 5 months ago
view in context

Don?t try to impose your personal feelings towards and inanimate object on others.
Guns exists in our society, they have since day one and they will until there is no longer a United States of America. Most CHL holders use education to maintain safety. Accusations that accident will happen are not valid. Millions of gun owner never have an accident. Why do you criminalize all?

posted 4 years, 5 months ago
view in context

Why do you have a problem with someone owning 100 guns? May be they are a collector.
Besides a person like that would never do anything illegal. They would want to lose their guns.

posted 4 years, 5 months ago
view in context

No, this should not be of public record because it makes permit holders susceptible to become potential targets from extremist groups.
Hitler started a registration program so he would know who to eliminate first. Knowledge is power.
Besides who cares if you neighbor has a permit. It has zero effect of how you live your life.

The police do an extensive background check, we should trust them. By wanting these records to be public clearly states that we the public do not trust the police. This is wrong.

People, who have permits, have them for two reasons, to protect themselves from confrontational crimes and to support the permit system.

People who want this information have personal issues that they need to work through themselves instead of blaming others for their problems.

posted 4 years, 5 months ago
view in context