Suggest a Topic
RECENTLY ON TOL:
The TOL Blog
TAGS:
1st congressional district
2012 election
2012 session
agriculture
art
arts
author
beer
births
books
budget
business
central oregon
college
congress
crime
culture
death penalty
eastern oregon
economy
education
employment
energy
environment
eugene
fishing
food
gangs
gay rights
health
health care
high school
history
homeless
housing
jobs
law
legislature
literature
living
media
mental health
military
movies
music
native americans
obama
occupy portland
occupy wall street
onthejob
oregon
our town
outdoors
parenting
police
politics
portland
portland business journal
portland mayor
pregnancy
prison
public health
race
rebroadcast
recess
recession
religion
republicans
rural
schools
science
shooting
sports
supreme court
talking business
technology
teen
theater
unemployment
union
university of oregon
washington
water
weekend
women
youth
see all tags >>
fenpaw34's comments:
on Sam Scandal
Sam did nothing illegal? He smeared a rival with his lie. That is illegal and immoral.
And he did it to obtain a powerful public office. That is scary.
The second point is he asked someone else to lie for him.
Third is he said (I can't find the quote) that to do what he was accused of would be poor judgment, and you can be sure he didn't do it because his judgment couldn't be that bad.
It isn't a question of do I think its poor judgment, HE thinks its poor judgment for him in his position to have sex with an 18 year old.
Fourth is that he was exceedingly vigorous over a period of years in promoting the lie.
It took a lot of work, a lot of time. It was the BIG lie that says: I must be telling the truth because no one would be this vigorous in defending a lie.
Fifth he was steadfast in maintaining the lie until it became untenable. It wasn't an attack of conscience that caused him to confess.
And he did it to obtain a powerful public office. That is scary.
The second point is he asked someone else to lie for him.
Third is he said (I can't find the quote) that to do what he was accused of would be poor judgment, and you can be sure he didn't do it because his judgment couldn't be that bad.
It isn't a question of do I think its poor judgment, HE thinks its poor judgment for him in his position to have sex with an 18 year old.
Fourth is that he was exceedingly vigorous over a period of years in promoting the lie.
It took a lot of work, a lot of time. It was the BIG lie that says: I must be telling the truth because no one would be this vigorous in defending a lie.
Fifth he was steadfast in maintaining the lie until it became untenable. It wasn't an attack of conscience that caused him to confess.
posted 3 years, 4 months ago
view in context


