2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

Has anyone noticed yet that the proposed $4.0 billion Columbia River Crossing will cost more than Washington DOT's plan to upgrade the railroad between Seattle and Portland, and run hourly express trains?  These trains will carry thousands of passengers a day, and relieve the whole of I-5 between these points.  By contrast, the CRC project will do little more than create a wide spot on I-5, since there is nowhere for more traffic to go in Portland.  Even the DOTs admit that.  How about some sanity here ?

posted 2 years, 2 months ago
view in context

The paid contrarians aside, most people believe we should be making better use of the railroads in the main demand corridors, such as the I-5 corridor between Eugene and Vancouver BC.

Compared to Washington, Oregon hasn't done much yet, and this is reflected in Washington getting some $750 million to upgrade the line between Portland and Seattle, while Oregon got a few million to fix the roof at Union Station !

It will cost billions to build a true high speed rail line in the corridor, a cost that present use cannot hope to justify.  A logical first step is to work with UP to upgrade the existing line to Eugene, and build up service, and demonstrate ridership.  A later stage would then begin to build a new line suitable for high speed operations (ie. with high speed curves, and no grade crossings.)  Note that neither the near term upgrade of existing service on UP, nor a true high speed line on a new alignment is likely to use the rail line through Lake Oswego that is so controversial

There is no doubt we'll eventually need high speed rail, and it certainly isn't going to get cheaper if we wait.  We need to start a program of incremental improvements now.

posted 2 years, 3 months ago
view in context