2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

I consider myself an expert, having been raised in a Christian Science home, and remembering my embarssment at being the only child in the class not getting the shots. One child asked me, "didn't my parents care what happened to me?" At age 80, I still am paying dearly for not having a broken back due to a serious skiing accident taken care of by physicians.

I think I have a solution. Have faith cure parents apply for a license that
would protect them from criminal charges. For that protection, they would have to agree to contact a specified medical worker if a child met certain
criteria: degree of pain (numerical) stated by the child, communicable diseases would be handled by their agreement to be out of public contact,
and other specific items. The agreement would be breached by failure. One
sentence should appear: We understand that in a serious situation, medicine,
according to our belief system, could not harm.
gordie albi - eugene

posted 5 years, 1 month ago
view in context