2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

There is no evidence that the parent's intention was to harm their child. I do not believe the state should not or need to intervene in the  parent's decisions on how to care for their children. This country was founded on religious freedom; so allow religious freedom.  It does not make any difference if I agree with their ( the parents) decision. I do not want the state to intefere with my right to raise my child as I see fit; not what the state or anyone else thinks. 

posted 3 years, 10 months ago
view in context