Suggest a Topic
RECENTLY ON TOL:
The TOL Blog
TAGS:
1st congressional district
2012 election
2012 session
agriculture
art
arts
author
beer
births
books
budget
business
central oregon
college
congress
crime
culture
death penalty
eastern oregon
economy
education
employment
energy
environment
eugene
fishing
food
gangs
gay rights
health
health care
high school
history
homeless
housing
jobs
law
legislature
literature
living
media
mental health
military
movies
music
native americans
obama
occupy portland
occupy wall street
onthejob
oregon
our town
outdoors
parenting
police
politics
portland
portland business journal
portland mayor
pregnancy
prison
public health
race
rebroadcast
recess
recession
religion
republicans
rural
schools
science
shooting
sports
supreme court
talking business
technology
teen
theater
unemployment
union
university of oregon
washington
water
weekend
women
youth
see all tags >>
jrep12's comments:
on Paying Per Mile
The excuse given by the Governor and state DOT officials is that gas tax revenue has fallen or will fall in response to people's choice of higher fuel efficiency vehicles. At this date, this is only a theoretical possibility. According to the USDOT report, Summary of Fuel Economy Performance (March 2008), the vehicle fleet fuel economy in 2008 is 26.8 mpg. This is virtually unchanged from 26.2 mpg in 1987.
The gas tax may not be a perfect mechanism for collecting revenue, but it's efficient and has very little administrative cost. For reasons others have cited (collecting from out-of-state residents, etc.), the gas tax seems a pretty good way of collecting.
Not enough has been collected in recent years to maintain the street and highway system, but that's because Oregon has failed to increase the tax per gallon since 1993! Our neighbors in Washington have added more than a dime per gallon since then. Is it any wonder their roads are in better shape than ours?
Almost everything has gone up in price in the last 15 years. Check the price of a first class stamp, or the Corps of Engineers' Construction Cost Index, or the price of the cheapest car you can drive on the road.
We've simply not been collecting enough. We must first decide on how much we should collect then do it and spend it on worthwhile projects.
I think the fairest way is to boost the gas tax. People quickly got used to $3.00 per gallon gas and finaly started reducing their driving. Adding five or ten cents per gallon would be unnoticed and would gain sorely needed revenue for critical projects.
A mileage tax would simply add a whole new bureaucracy and reduce any incentive for people to drive more fuel efficient cars.
The gas tax may not be a perfect mechanism for collecting revenue, but it's efficient and has very little administrative cost. For reasons others have cited (collecting from out-of-state residents, etc.), the gas tax seems a pretty good way of collecting.
Not enough has been collected in recent years to maintain the street and highway system, but that's because Oregon has failed to increase the tax per gallon since 1993! Our neighbors in Washington have added more than a dime per gallon since then. Is it any wonder their roads are in better shape than ours?
Almost everything has gone up in price in the last 15 years. Check the price of a first class stamp, or the Corps of Engineers' Construction Cost Index, or the price of the cheapest car you can drive on the road.
We've simply not been collecting enough. We must first decide on how much we should collect then do it and spend it on worthwhile projects.
I think the fairest way is to boost the gas tax. People quickly got used to $3.00 per gallon gas and finaly started reducing their driving. Adding five or ten cents per gallon would be unnoticed and would gain sorely needed revenue for critical projects.
A mileage tax would simply add a whole new bureaucracy and reduce any incentive for people to drive more fuel efficient cars.
posted 3 years, 4 months ago
view in context


