2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session 2013 special election arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

Question: Has anyone given consideration to having a Toll/No Toll crossing on  the I-5 bridge?

Benefit: The huge cost could be paid for, and toll payers could have quicker access across bridge by having more lanes available. No Toll payers would still be able to cross, just a bit slower. Both would benefit in their realm of choice.

This could be set up in either direction, and at critical times of the day.
And, the program could be changed/ended at any future time.

posted 2 years, 9 months ago
view in context