2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

I support what the president is trying to do, but I must admit I am a bit worried about what mandated coverage for individuals will mean.  I don't think I could afford another bill right now.  I understand that expemptions would be made for people who are low income but the details are all pretty fuzzy.  How will they decide what low income is and does that mean the poorest of us will still be without insurance?  How much will those who need to get their own policies have to pay?  As much as I believe in healthcare reform it's a bit scary to dive in without having any idea how it will affect me financially. 

I remember when I had insurance.  I actually paid much more for routine doctor visits than what I paid at sliding scale county health clinics without insurance.  I'm hoping that if we have a public option it too would be more affordable.

posted 3 years, 8 months ago
view in context