2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session 2013 special election arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration international internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

Tom Partin's focus on fire and disease in forests is another red herring, and one often used by the timber industry, which he is speaking for. The timber industry wants you to think that they simply want to manage our forests and "fix" them, but it's just an excuse they're using to take down the big timber that remains on public land. As long as we don't have permanent protection of old growth, they will try every excuse they can think of. Fire and disease are NATURAL processes, and a normal part of our forests.

posted 4 years, 6 months ago
view in context

Regardless of how you define the age of old growth, it is easy to figure out what forests are virgin forests and have never been touched by a chainsaw. These virgin forests are almost always old growth, though often of poorer quality than the old growth that used to blanket our state, because the best was the first to be cut. But even these virgin forests that remain, about 10% of our current forests, are being pursued tirelessly by logging interests. Logging companies have never been satisfied with the number of massive trees that they cash in on, and they never will be until permanent old growth protections are in place.

posted 4 years, 6 months ago
view in context

I'm not a woman (99% sure) but I want to mention what for me is a CRUCIAL point in the abortion debate, and one that I never hear discussed. I first learned about this back in college during a Philosophy and Ethics class where we broke down the arguments of both sides with respect to weighty moral issues. With the abortion issue we inevitably talked about the moment of conception, and how most of those opposing abortion view conception as the moment when babies acquire the right to life, and when our souls are in effect "birthed". I also learned that after conception a surprisingly large percentage of pregnancies are spontaneously (or naturally) aborted, and this is also called miscarriage. This is a completely natural process, completely independent of human action and often without even the knowledge of the pregnant woman. The only only one that can take any responsibility for that one is God, right? Does this mean that God is planting souls in babies after conception, and then snuffing them out, or does this mean that the right to life is not as straightforward as pro-lifers would like to think? If you believe (as John McCain and Sarah Palin do) that life absolutely begins at conception and that abortion is murder, then it also means we have a rather murderous God.....(for those with the traditional view of an omnipotent God).

- Kristian

posted 4 years, 8 months ago
view in context