2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session 2013 special election arts arts and culture author ballot measures bomb books budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration international internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal portland mayor president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes television terrorism theater third parties timber payments transportation union university of oregon violence washington water wildfire women

Good show, good topic, good points.

posted 3 years, 5 months ago
view in context

I think there's too much debate between religion and such, and less people focus on whether or not they are bothering someone else for whatever reason. Why would your opinion be a better one than mine?

I don't want to see people running around naked, and I'm not a religious person. I just don't think genitals are attractive, and I think that's all that matters. Some people don't like it, and it doesn't matter why. You can be nude other places.

You don't need to protest fossil feuls by being nude, but they also don't need to ban it outright.

Either way, banning it outright or saying it should be okay in any situation is just trying shove your opinion in someone else's face.

Can't both sides respect each other?

posted 3 years, 5 months ago
view in context