2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

Last night the president drew snickers from members of Congress when he said that many details are yet to be worked out. That's an understatement.

Here's a detail that has yet to be addressed: What about employers who pay for the insurance of employees but not their families? How are family members to become insured in such situations or are employers going to be required to pay full family coverage? That's very expensive.

posted 3 years, 8 months ago
view in context