Suggest a Topic
RECENTLY ON TOL:
The TOL Blog
TAGS:
1st congressional district
2012 election
2012 session
agriculture
art
arts
author
beer
births
books
budget
business
central oregon
college
congress
crime
culture
death penalty
eastern oregon
economy
education
employment
energy
environment
eugene
fishing
food
gangs
gay rights
health
health care
high school
history
homeless
housing
jobs
kids
law
legislature
literature
living
media
mental health
military
movies
music
native americans
obama
occupy portland
occupy wall street
onthejob
oregon
our town
outdoors
parenting
police
politics
portland
portland business journal
portland mayor
pregnancy
prison
public health
race
rebroadcast
recess
recession
religion
republicans
rural
schools
science
shooting
sports
supreme court
talking business
technology
teen
theater
unemployment
union
university of oregon
washington
water
weekend
women
youth
see all tags >>
mizerello's comments:
on The Klamath Example: How to Tear Down a Dam
I was born and raised in a small fishing village in Alaska located in the Prince William Sound, site of the Exxon Valdez oil spill of 1989. While the media long-ago left the area and Exxon suggests it has been cleaned up, the people trying to make a living in the fishing industry there will tell you that fishing has never been the same. They still find oil under rocks on beaches. I remember thinking several years ago during the severe drought that crippled the Klamath Basin, that, as usual, the fish and the fishermen did not seem to have a lobby or a voice speaking for them. The farmers involved at that time kept sneering that "people were more important than fish."
I have absolutely no faith that the Klamath Settlement will amount to anymore than a "save" for the farmers and long-distance (rich) ranchers in the Klamath Basin. The fishermen and, more importantly, the fish, will ultimately lose in this deal. What the farmers fail to recognize is that if we continue to pollute and use our natural resources irresponsibly it's not just the fish that will die. They are a small part of the larger ecosystem in which we all reside. At some point, we are all going to have to begin to make sacrifices or we will all go the way of the fish.
The farmers in the basin act as though they have the right to continue, as usual, farming crops that require considerable irrigation. Rather than fight to maintain the status quo, why are they not looking into farming crops that don't require as much water? Why are they not looking into farming in a manner that doesn't add polution to the streams and rivers which we all need to survive? Most of the land farmed in the Klamath Basin was given to the farmers by the federal government. Most of the farmers also receive substantial subsidies from the government as well. No-one seems to be speaking for the fishermen in this deal. And, believe me, the fishermen are not receiving subsidies from the federal government. As usual, this deal will simply allow the status quo to continue, until it is too late to save our rivers or our fish. It will then be too late for all of us.
I have absolutely no faith that the Klamath Settlement will amount to anymore than a "save" for the farmers and long-distance (rich) ranchers in the Klamath Basin. The fishermen and, more importantly, the fish, will ultimately lose in this deal. What the farmers fail to recognize is that if we continue to pollute and use our natural resources irresponsibly it's not just the fish that will die. They are a small part of the larger ecosystem in which we all reside. At some point, we are all going to have to begin to make sacrifices or we will all go the way of the fish.
The farmers in the basin act as though they have the right to continue, as usual, farming crops that require considerable irrigation. Rather than fight to maintain the status quo, why are they not looking into farming crops that don't require as much water? Why are they not looking into farming in a manner that doesn't add polution to the streams and rivers which we all need to survive? Most of the land farmed in the Klamath Basin was given to the farmers by the federal government. Most of the farmers also receive substantial subsidies from the government as well. No-one seems to be speaking for the fishermen in this deal. And, believe me, the fishermen are not receiving subsidies from the federal government. As usual, this deal will simply allow the status quo to continue, until it is too late to save our rivers or our fish. It will then be too late for all of us.
posted 4 years, 3 months ago
view in context


