2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

First, thanks for such a great show. I wonder if the natural wonder and diversity of Oregon (not just Portland) is an attraction for filmmakers as well. That is, we have high desert (and great light), some magnificent small towns (with their David Lynch characteristics), and a great core of indie and small filmmakers (the Northwest Film Center, among others). I have to add that Portland would be a perfect site for a noirish detective style program -- all those rain-slicked streets in winter! When that happens, Portland will have arrived!

Michael Clark (PSU prof)

posted 2 years, 9 months ago
view in context

I'm a professor of film at PSU, as well as a lawyer, and I've been detained (not in Portland, but in my old home state of NJ) for videotaping in a state park. I was shooting video images of birds and some pleasant shots of the Hudson River, and I was detained by four police cruisers for two hours for videotaping without a permit. I have since filed a number of administrative queries (no formal legal action yet) to ask that the police authorities make VERY clear their rules about video, photographic, and other recording methods.

The general rule of law here, by the way, always has to do with regulations or laws that are overbroad (they can hit more targets than they're aimed at) or vague (they can be used for any purpose). I'm surprised that this standard hasn't been mentioned yet. I'm not sure the police authority, as it's currently articulated, can meet those standards.

posted 4 years, 8 months ago
view in context