2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session 2013 special election arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

I return my bottles because I paid a deposit and I want my money back, but the main reason is because it's the responsible thing to do.

I hope all listeners see the grocers & retailers position for the spin it is. Single serve beverages are hugely profitable for manufactures and retailers and responsibly taking care of the containers is the cost of doing business. I would be all for allowing any retailer to refuse to accept containers if they choose not to sell single serve beverages. I doubt any would be willing to make that sacrifice. I don't for a second buy the argument that someone's safety is in danger from the empty containers - that's what the rubber gloves are for. I expect the grocers & retailers to fight this tooth and nail, but they're on the losing end of a good fight.

posted 4 years, 11 months ago
view in context