2012 conventions 2012 election 2013 session arts arts and culture author ballot measures basketball bomb books boy scouts budget bullying business charlie hales children clackamas climate change coal college courts crime culture culture club democrats drugs economy education environment family film fluoride food gay rights guns handguns health health care health insurance high school history housing immigration internet kitzhaber law legislature lgbt literary arts living marijuana marriage media medicine mental health military minor parties mohamed mohamud movies music native americans news newspaper obama olympics oregon our town parenting pers photography police politcs politics port portland portland business journal president prevention public safety religion republicans rnc romney rural salem sam adams sandy hook schools science shooting sports suicide supreme court taxes technology television terrorism theater third parties transportation union university of oregon washington wildfire women

As a Clark College almuni, I was shocked when I heard the news of hate speech being spread around the campus. Especially due to the fact that I often worked with the office of multicultural affairs to help fight AGAINST hate speech and intolerance.

However, I am also a firm believer in the first ammendment and by not allowing the student to speak on his behave would be disrespecting the rights guaranteed to him by our constitution.

As far as the school's action, I think it was more than appropriate. They had many faculty members in psychology, sociology and history explain the consequences of hate, in addition to letting the student speak on his behalf.

posted 2 years, 6 months ago
view in context